兰州市洒水治污政策变迁路径与动力研究——基于定性比较分析法

    Study on the Motivation and Path of Lanzhou Irrigation Pollution Control Policy—Based on Qualitative Comparative Analysis

    • 摘要: 以兰州市洒水车治污政策为研究案例,应用清晰集定性比较分析法(Crisp-set QCA)研究地方政府具体环保政策的变迁问题。分析发现,自上而下的政治压力、公众舆论压力、媒介压力、专家压力以及领导变更等五类8个解释变量可以作为案例政策变迁的驱动因素,其中,中央媒介压力是政策变迁的必要条件。按照不同的驱动因素组合,兰州洒水治污政策变迁有4种演进路径,其中,最短路径是“中央媒介压力且网络媒介压力”与“领导批示且中央媒介压力”。此外,在本政策案例中,领导批示不但没有促成政策变迁,甚至不构成变迁的必要条件。无论是“地方领导留言板”,还是“门户网站留言板”均非政策变迁的充分或必要条件,因此未能彰显公民参与在政策问题建构中的权力扩大,公众并没有实质拥有建构权,也未能成为建构主体,仅依赖互动平台的构建是无法打破原有的政策问题建构秩序的,因而也不能促使政策变迁彰显民意。

       

      Abstract: Based on the case of Lanzhou sprinkler pollution control policy,the problem of policy change is studied creatively by using clear set qualitative comparative analysis method. The analysis shows that top-down political variables,public opinion pressure,media pressure,expert pressure,and leadership change can be used as the driving factors of the policy change. Central media pressure is a necessary condition for policy change. According to the combination of different drivers,Lanzhou sprinkler pollution control policy changes have four evolution paths, of which the shortest path is "central media pressure and network media pressure" and "leadership instructions and central media pressure." In addition,in this policy case, the leadership not only cannot lead to policy changes, and even does not constitute a necessary condition for change. Whether it is "local leadership message board" or "portal message board" are non-policy changes in the full or necessary conditions, the public did not have the right to construct, the public did not become the main body of the construction, relying solely on the construction of interactive platform is not able to change the original policy construction order,and therefore can not Promote policy changes to highlight public opinion.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    Baidu
    map