Abstract: Regarding the determination of IPR infringement jurisdiction in online sales, the main problems in practice are:the improper understanding of the "information network approach" in Article 20 of the judicial interpretation of the Civil Procedure Law, and the "infringement" in Article 28 of the Civil Procedure Law."Behavioural ground" is improperly understood, and it is not analogous to the conclusion in the "Interpretation of Computer Network Copyright Disputes". This approach not only violates the existing legislative purpose of the Civil Litigation Law, but also fully considers the characteristics of IP sales infringement on the Internet. Therefore, it should be clarified that the place of receipt of goods on the Internet is not the jurisdiction of the use of Internet infringement of intellectual property rights. For this purpose, the problem can be improved by determining the principle of protective jurisdiction and drawing on the rules of long arm jurisdiction.