同居关系的法律调整:事实与规范之间

    Legal Regulation of Cohabitation: Between Facts and Norms

    • 摘要: 规范视角下同居关系是无配偶的异性自愿结成共同体的实践总和,其与婚姻关系具有相似的内核并共享子女利益最大化、弱者保护等价值基础,因此具备法律调整的必要性和正当性。同居关系的法律调整须尊重当事人自治的优先性并协调多元价值的平衡,在技术上应区分人身效力和财产效力。就人身效力而言,同居者之间仅有扶助义务而无忠实义务,同居关系的解除遵循自由原则,但解除后的子女抚养和极端的利益失衡仍然受到法律调整。就财产效力而言,同居经济共同体本质为民事合伙,同居期间双方各自取得的财产归个人所有,基于共同生活或共同生产经营的财产归双方共同共有。同居关系解除时,共有财产的分割以双方的出资或贡献为标准,并兼顾子女利益、女方利益和无过错方的保护,付出家务劳动更多的一方有权请求另一方补偿。

       

      Abstract: From a normative perspective, cohabitation is the sum total of the practice of voluntary community of non-spousal heterosexuals, which has a similar kernel as marriage and shares the value base of maximizing the interests of children and protecting the weak, and therefore has the necessity and legitimacy of legal adjustment. The legal regulation of cohabitation must respect the priority of party autonomy and harmonize the balance of multiple values, technically distinguishing between personal and property effects. In terms of personal effects, there is only a duty of support but not a duty of fidelity between cohabitants, and the dissolution of the cohabitation relationship is based on the principle of freedom, but child support and the extreme imbalance of interests after dissolution are still subject to legal adjustment. In terms of property effects, cohabitation economic community is essentially a civil partnership, during the cohabitation period, the property acquired by each party belongs to the individual, and the property acquired based on the common life or common production and management of property belongs to both parties. When a cohabitation relationship is dissolved, the division of common property is based on the contributions of both parties, taking into account the interests of the children, the interests of the woman and the protection of the party not at fault, with the party who has done more housework entitled to request compensation from the other party.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    Baidu
    map