刑事诉讼专门性证据的证明风险与制度防范

    Proof Risk and Institutional Prevention of Specialized Evidence in Criminal Procedure

    • 摘要: 专门性证据在刑事诉讼中发挥着越来越重要的作用,大量刑事案件的侦破、起诉和审判都离不开专门性证据的支撑。专门性证据的运用也给传统司法证明制度带来风险,如专门性证据的泛化适用、向法律问题偏移及证明力不当升格等,导致司法权的割裂。这种证明风险的形成与证明对象和内容有关,也是法律制度不完备所致。为了维护刑事诉讼程序的制度功能,保证审判权的完整性,有必要从制度建设、程序保障、要素优化等方面对中国专门性证据制度进行系统重构,将专门性证据的证明风险控制在一定限度内,最大程度地助力刑事诉讼程序的顺利进行。

       

      Abstract: Specialized evidence plays an increasingly important role in criminal proceedings, and the investigation, prosecution, and trial of a large number of criminal cases cannot be separated from the support of specialized evidence. However, the use of specialized evidence also brings risks to the traditional judicial proof system, such as the generalization of specialized evidence, deviation from legal issues, and improper upgrading of evidentiary power, leading to the fragmentation of judicial power. The formation of this type of proof risk is not only related to the object and content of the proof, but also due to the incomplete legal system. In order to maintain the institutional function of criminal proceedings and ensure the integrity of judicial power, it is necessary to systematically reconstruct China’s specialized evidence system from the aspects of institutional construction, procedural protection, and element optimization, so as to control the risk of proof of specialized evidence within a certain limit and maximize the assistance to the smooth progress of criminal proceedings.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回
    Baidu
    map